Your first brief
What you’ll produce
Section titled “What you’ll produce”At the end of this walkthrough you’ll have:
- A meeting object with its transcript attached.
- A brief (also called a PRD in the schema) drafted from the transcript by the chief-of-staff.
- An approved plan — 2 to 6 steps — fanned out as child tickets.
- A Slack / Teams thread showing the approval flow.
If something goes wrong partway through, each step is re-runnable from the UI — you don’t have to start over.
Step 1: create a project
Section titled “Step 1: create a project”Projects scope everything. A single workspace can have many projects; meetings, briefs, and tickets always belong to one.
- Sidebar → Projects → New project.
- Name it (e.g. “Mobile app redesign”), pick a color swatch, describe it in a sentence.
- Save.
The sidebar’s project switcher now shows your new project as the active scope. Every list you see — meetings, briefs, tickets — is filtered to this project until you switch.
Step 2: upload a meeting
Section titled “Step 2: upload a meeting”You have three ways to create a meeting:
- Upload a recording (mp3 / m4a / webm) — Whisper transcribes.
- Paste a transcript — skip transcription, go straight to brief drafting.
- Dial in by phone — Twilio + Gemini Live; real-time. See Voice dial-in.
For the first run, paste a transcript. Copy something real:
PM: I want to redesign the onboarding flow. Signups are flat and the first-week retention is at 22%. I want a new flow, mobile-first, tested with 5 users before we ship. Eng: OK, that’s probably 3 weeks. I want to split it into a design spike first. PM: Fine. Let’s decide by Friday.
Paste this into the text field, click Create meeting. The UI takes you to the meeting detail page.
Step 3: generate a brief
Section titled “Step 3: generate a brief”On the meeting detail page, click Generate brief.
The chief-of-staff now:
- Reads the transcript and any prior project history.
- Drafts a brief — title, goal, target users, success metrics, open questions, proposed scope.
- If it has meaningful open questions, posts them to your comms channel (“Hey, before I fan this out, two quick questions…”).
- Persists the brief as a PRD row in the database.
You now see the draft brief in the web UI, with status Pending approval.
Step 4: review + approve
Section titled “Step 4: review + approve”You (or the exec, in production) review the brief. Two paths:
Approve from the web UI. Click Approve on the brief. This sets
the brief status to approved and enqueues a chief_of_staff ticket
for plan decomposition.
Approve from Slack. The same message posted to Slack has three buttons — Approve, Redirect, Pause. Tap Approve. The thread updates to “Plan accepted” within 5 seconds.
Either way, the chief-of-staff now decomposes the approved brief.
Step 5: watch the plan land
Section titled “Step 5: watch the plan land”The decomposition uses the multi-model AI Council (if you’ve configured more than one provider) with self-consistency and a critique-and-revise loop. See Brief generation for the details.
The output is an ExecutionPlan row with 2–6 steps:
1. ba_agent — User research: 5 onboarding interviews.2. architect — Design spike: 3 candidate flows + tradeoff memo.3. dev_agent — Implement chosen flow behind a feature flag.4. qa_agent — Acceptance test plan + manual run.Each step becomes a child ticket in the queue. Specialist agents (BA, architect, dev, QA) pull them:
ba_agent+architecttickets run server-side against your BYOK frontier model.dev_agent+qa_agenttickets run on your machine via the AgentHub daemon — code-gen uses your Claude Code / Cursor subscription so production source code never leaves your laptop.
Step 6: follow up
Section titled “Step 6: follow up”As each ticket completes, the chief-of-staff posts a short update to Slack:
✓ BA research complete (5 interviews summarized). Next up: architect on design spike (ETA 2 hours).
Failed tickets trigger an automatic replan with the failure
signature fed back into the next plan prompt. You see this as a new
ExecutionPlan row with attempt: 2; the first plan is marked
superseded.
What’s happening under the hood?
Section titled “What’s happening under the hood?”If you want to understand the machinery you just ran:
- System overview — the moving parts.
- Chief of Staff — how the planner works.
- Project Graph — how code context enters the prompt for engineering-touching briefs.
What if something goes wrong?
Section titled “What if something goes wrong?”Every surface in the loop is replayable.
| Thing that broke | Do this |
|---|---|
| Transcript upload failed | Try again; Whisper occasionally 503s on free tier. |
| Brief is garbled / weird | On the brief, click Regenerate — it re-runs with a fresh prompt. |
| Plan has wrong steps | Open the plan, click Replan with a reason. The chief of staff folds the reason into the next prompt. |
| A ticket failed | The chief-of-staff already replanned. Check the new plan in Activity. |
From here: Daily workflow covers what the exec’s week looks like.